"However, the evidence available currently suggests no other actor than... No other possible actor than..."

You really have got to do better than that. And not once have I ever said "it could have been anyone." In fact, I think I've said several times that it is more likely than not to have been Russia. Words to that effect. And what I said about circumstantial evidence doesn't clash with what you said at all. But coming to your logical conclusions needs a more solid set of premises than you currently have to hand, unfortunately. I'm still waiting for your "more than circumstantial " evidence, by the way. Finally, do keep it civil between us. You're getting a bit too sarky-out-loud. Calling my opinions crap or rubbish doesn't make them any more so than they may already be, and my name is Steve.