PFR,

When a post is made, and the NEXT JC post says that something quoted in that post was never on the net, I do not think I am dealing with a reasonable debater. I supply my quote, and the clickey for him to verify it.

JC throws out claims, phrased as factual, without regard to providing any supporting information- and then jumps on others to prove things, that he refuses to even read when provided the information that indicates his opinion is not true to the facts.

I don't want a brawl, but I will not tolerate his abuse. Nor should others.


JC states:
"The point of this exceptionally brave man's statement is that the UN (and the rest of the world) are staying silent about what was happening
I can'r remember that ever happening in a case like this were dozens of unarmed demonstrators were being shot down"

I have shown that the UN HAS commented on this from 30 March onward- HIS claim is FALSE. Isn't that a valid point to bring up in a debate? Or do I have to let him make up things, and accept them, as he demands proof of anything others say?