The point was, mayomick, that at that point in time no-one had much of a clue as to why the objection had been raised. So a sensible person might take the trouble to consider the fact that Chope has a considerable amount of technical knowledge of both the law & of parliamentary procedure, and that that would likely provide the reason for his objecting (which it did).

From your fatuous "Like saying..." I can only assume that you would, like Sen, have jumped to a stupid & wholly incorrect conclusion had you commented a week ago...