DMcG, you are more guilty of misrepresentation than me.
Jim's accurate remark that David Davis insisted [the December document] was much more a statement of intent than "legally enforceable" almost immediately after the agreement was issued. That is what he said. Jim knows he did,

Jim actually said this, "They promise a soft border, then in the next breath say it wasn't a promise but an 'aim.'"


He was wrong and I was right to correct him.
The UK position has always and unequivocally been no hard border.

Your attempts to justify ignoring facts put to you are pathetic.

the EU are making clear than one of the options rumoured to be under consideration is not, (workable and realistic)

They always claim that because they do not want a successful negotiation because they do not want us to leave.
We say it is workable and realistic, they say it is not.
Why do you only believe them and only criticise our side?