You have no grounds whatsoever for claiming that Gina Miller's successful attempt to maintain parliamentary democracy (at the expense of the exercising of a prerogative that the courts decided that May doesn't have) was an attempt to "thwart Brexit." That's just neurotic.
The Guardian ( a tabloid often quoted by Remainers) describes gina Miller as: "The anti-Brexit activist". You may see her as a pro-democracy activist, but others see her differently.

The Brexit is no sacred cow, we live in a democracy in which free speech is enjoyed and anyone who wants to is fully entitled to argue against brexit and ensure that proper procedure is being followed, right up to the last minute. It's amusing that people like you who bleat on about the referendum result being the democratic will of the people, etc., persist in arguing against that and in vilifying people such as Gina Miller (and those judges). Absolute rank hypocrisy. I have not Vilified Gina Miller, or the judges. You're in rant mode once again.

You have no counter-argument, that's your trouble, just a load of pie-in-the-sky, jam tomorrow, it'll be all right on the night pipe dreams about the post-brexit world. It's very troubling to you that we remainers won't keep conveniently quiet, and so it should be.
To have a 'counter-argument' requires an argument to be put forward first. What argument are you expecting me to counter?

Enjoy your insecurity. There are very good grounds for it.
I'm not insecure. You're the one imitating Chicken Little: "The sky is falling, the sky is falling"