Oh dear,oh dear, oh dear.
If Shaw is correct and the rest of humanity is wrong tis a strange thing that several newspapers have articles running accusing Hains of dipping his toes in matters judicial. If the court case was terminated these accusations would not be made. Neither would they be made had the matter not been sub judice.
I do admit that I find it a little strange that their use of language is so coy. Perhaps by breaching his own Parliamentary code Hains has created something of a constitutional crisis and and they wish to play it down so the hoipolloi miss the main event. We shall see how it plays out. Remember when Tommy Robinson was found in contempt of court he was slung in jail. I wonder what protection Hains has for breaching Parliamentary rules. I know a Mr Moneybags that will have teams scouring the law books and case law to crucify the man.
As I have already stated not only did Hains use Parliamentary privilege but he abused it by breaking the very clear rules of the house. Furthermore he did so deliberately, knowing full well the matter was to be resolved in court as a matter of urgency.
He used Parliamntary privilege to name names as is his right
He did so knowing the matter was still to come under the consideration of the courts
He knew the court would reach a decision in the near future
He decided to deliberately frustrate the function of the judiciary by
preempting their decision.
I am not too sure that Parliamentary Privilege encompasses all his mis/deeds. I think this will have to play out in the courts at a later date.
I am surprised these issues were not picked over in the media- or am I?

He has been a very naughty boy and Mr Green will make sure his ass is grass. I look forward to his comeuppance. I hope the ticket sales start soon!
Furthermore the administrative, executive and judiciary are very very protective of their fiefdoms and if they feel they have been slighted we may well see hell on wheels as they defend their territory.
We live in interesting times!