You still carefully ignore the main issue. Hains thwarted the right of the judiciary to make a definitive ruling. .

"You think that a serial bully and sex pest is more virtuous. Grand. "

Care to point out where I have stated that? Are you going to waffle and evade like your little mate, or man up and admit you made it all up.

As Anne Widdecombe said:
"I am defending the supremacy of law and anybody who does not understand the difference should go back to school."
That has always been my position and you can find it stated consistently in my posts.

I wonder if the injunction was repeated under Scottish Law. If not Hains might have been able to contact a Scottish Newspaper and break the story anonymously. But that would have stopped Hains grandstanding and perhaps not succeeded in deflecting attention away from the renewed accusations of antisemitism within certain of the Labour Party.
I wonder where the real truth lies?