I find it very interesting that remainers on the one hand complain they were not given sufficient information prior to the referendum, and on the other complain that 'illegal' donations swung the vote,presumably by enabling too much information.
Is there not a rather fundamental flaw in the argument somewhere?

It has already been established that the elections watchdog “misinterpreted” spending rules surrounding donations by the official Brexit campaign during the EU referendum, the High Court has ruled.
Donations to both sides seem to lack clarity.

From Reuters
Ever since the shock vote, supporters of EU membership have been exploring an array of different legal and political methods to prevent what they see as the biggest mistake in post-World War Two British history.

Brexiteers say such efforts threaten political stability as they go against the democratic will of 17.4 million people. They have vowed to fight any attempt to stop Brexit.

“The new Soros-led coalition is planning a coup in Britain, against the democratic will of the people,” Richard Tice, who chairs the Leave Means Leave campaign group, told Reuters. “They have been outed and will be defeated.”