Sigh. Nitpicking Nigel once again. I would be more than happy to provide as many as you like that do support the view that everyone but you you and your little troupe of verbal acrobats accept but there is little point. They have been linked already over and over again in the past 2300 posts. If I was to provide more you would only ignore them as well.
Hardly 'nitpicking'. You selected three links to support your argument, and they do not do so. Some, such as Backwoodsman: "I do have to smile wryly and shake my head when I read someone dismissing the informed forecasts and estimates of recognised and acknowledged sources of business, economic, and political analysis, in favour of their own 'opinions'" might not choose to actually read the links but to assume that they support your argument.
If there are several thousand such links available, why not provide the ones which actually support your contentions?