The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #164605   Message #3969594
Posted By: Nigel Parsons
03-Jan-19 - 11:52 AM
Thread Name: Brexit #2
Subject: RE: Brexit #2
Nigel, In the past two and half years as Dave has said there have been hundreds, if not thousands, of reports of the probable negative impacts of Brexit.
I presume you read the newspapers, watch the news and listen to the radio so these cannot have escaped your attention.
Yet you ask that you are provided with these again.


Try reading what I wrote. I am not asking to be shown more links to guesses of what might happen when/if we leave the EU. As you rightly say, I can read these anywhere.
What I was asking was that, if links to external articles are used to back up arguments being made here, then they should show support for the argument being made. The three links given by Dave:
Stanron: What evidence do you have that almost 100% of all economists, most business leaders and the government itself actually say what you say they say?

Dave the Gnome:I can't believe that after over 2000 posts, many of them linking news items confirming what I say, that you are asking that question but, here goes...

Do the links support the viewpoint that: "almost 100% of all economists, most business leaders and the government itself actually say what you (Dave) say they say?"

My post was not even showing a pro/anti Brexit bias. It was asking that an honest form of discussion be used when giving links.