I wish to say something here.

There were two people directly involved in the alleged transaction.

We have the account of one of them and the denial of the other.

No-one here was present at the time. The context is unknown to us apart from via hearsay and we haven't had the reports of any witnesses. We don't know what exchanges led to the incident. We are told that the lead-up was consensual but we don't know when or if the consensuality ceased because we have only the say-so of one participant.

It's all conjecture here in this thread and there's little or nothing we can, or should, say about it, it seems to me.

But please yourselves, of course.