Hiesenberg started this form of inquiry and the math backs it up. Space and time and gravity are not fundamental forces but are emergent energies from an underlying interaction.

As for the video it is a short, dumbed down, well made, simple and less dry than other cosmology classroom recordings.

I have watched many TED talks and PBS series concerning the emerging universe that have panalists who are leading physicists as well as a Bhuddist authority.

Yes you can say a visual equivalence of neural axion structures in the brain and the super structure of the visible universe is gibberish but I too have asked these questions. The resemblance has inspired my wonder for more than a decade. It may only have a fractal relationship. So?

I am made of this universe and feel the emergent theory has an organic truthful geometry the way some people feel about Gaia.
Seeing the universe in terms of emerging energy vectors may lead to a unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics. It does require us to think in non human terms.

I understand judging that particular video by its cover but I would not sell the concept short. Quantum tunneling, Quantum biology, Quantum micro tubuelles in our brain, Quantum mechanisms in photo sythesis are now proven science. Emerging space and time effects makes sense to me on a macro scale that is at the limits of an imagined big picture. If you can only think in terms of the standard model, that is awfully reductionist.