To be honest, for some people,
Mudcat would be better off if I would leave for somewhere else.
Now I am most mindful that Mudcat has a policy
that one does not post remarks about, erm,
a certain way that things are done here.
That said, the fact is that of my many posts at Mudcat,
numerous posts have prompted others to correct me outright
or to suggest that I ought to have said/done differently.
I do take direction, sometimes more graciously than others.
So I ought to hold myself accountable. I attempt to do so.

"More suited for Facebook," though, confounds me
because I am not in a position to know that that means exactly.

Now if this post provokes sarcasm and irony and cynicism, too bad.
But this thread is in earnest, because I might get that suggestion again with some future post
and it would be well to have a clue what is being talked about.

Here's another one:
why on earth would I subscribe/enroll at Facebook
1. because everybody else is doing it
2. because talk is cheap over there
3. just to find out what all the fuss is about?

The way I understand it,
at Facebook I am required to give my legal official name
which I am cautious about putting online on the world wide web.
Can't come up with a membername such as I use for my Mudcat membership.