I see the US is insisting that that the lower food standards (as exemplified by but not limited to the infamous chlorinated chicken) must be part of the trade deal, while Rabb and Johnson insist in will not be.

So it will be, then.

(Before anyone says, it is not to do with chlorinated chicken is or is not safe: if you demonstrated it was safe, that still leaves all the other differing standards, so don't bother thinking that is all about chicken. In any case, wasn't it all about taking back control so if we say 'no', that is what happens … isn't it?)