"You claim that Harker wasn't taking a pop at the collectors" Jim Carroll

"Harker's definition of 'mediation' was not prejudicial the way he applied it to most collector's was" Me.

I didn't claim that Harker "wasn't taking a pop at collectors". On the contrary I referred to a consensus amongst several posters here that he was.

You misread and misrepresent my post Jim. Which is why I don't need "examples of our untrustworthiness" to wonder if you might be mistaken about what other people mean.