A new post and a new theme:

I've read a lot yesterday in the pages kat has linked too. My impression mirrors Skeptic's. Too much opinion. There are very tiny indications (in language and argumentation) that remind me of the cold fusion debate. Duesberg to me seems to be on the beginning of the slippery road from honourable dissenter to a parascientist who isn't taken serious by his peers any longer. Some of these dissenters have been proved right later in the history of science (e.g. Wegener, who was right for the wrong reasons, in his ideas on continental drift), but the vast majority of them is cpmpletely forgotten with extremely good reasons.

Wolfgang