Source or sources, Jim for Mr. Oakapple's cut-n-paste "factual" description?? And which of the many assertions are "factual"??

Its all still tu quoque nonsense.


He might well have used the conditions of those transported to the colonies - irs 'The New World' then Tasmania as examples of slavery -

He might, but he'd be wrong. Those were indentured servants, "redemptioners" or convicts, not chattel slaves owned as property..