More -

If you grant that the "problem" is the nature of man (and I don't really consider it a problem as much as the conditions under which we are expected to work), does it matter which system is in place? Some would say "No; man's nature will subvert the best intentions of any system designer." I would disagree. I believe the key is to design a system that builds on the strengths of human nature and protects us from the failings.

For example - If you feel that GREED is a problem, don't design a system which puts a strong emphasis on acquiring stuff for oneself. If COOPERATION is a strength, build a system that rewards the ability to work together.

We are a species where each individual is born too weak and helpless to survive on our own. We do not possess the greatest strength or speed of all mobile creatures and we don't possess natural defense mechanisms like shells, tusks, claws or overwhelming stench (well, at least not all of us).

How have we managed to survive at all? We learn. And we discard old, outmoded learning which no longer serves to benefit the species. We changed our view of our place in the universe when the physical evidence finally overcame our superstitious ethnocentrism. We changed our view of the makeup of the stuff of the universe. We have learned so much about STUFF in the few thousand years we've been around.

But every change in thinking is fought every step of the way. And the willingness to entertain new modes of thought seems to shrink more every day. Certain topics cannot even be broached without risking enmity that can escalate to mayhem. Abortion. Euthenasia. Capital Punishment. Sexual Orientation. Equitable Redistribution of Global Resources. Heresy.

How the H*ll did this happen? How the H*ll are we going to survive the next thousand years?

I'm off to ponder the eternal mysteries. Or maybe I'll just watch some TV, have dinner and a glass of wine.

Have a great night,all.
Bart