The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #172164   Message #4166448
Posted By: The Sandman
01-Mar-23 - 12:53 AM
Thread Name: BS: (Another) matter of etiquette.
Subject: RE: BS: (Another) matter of etiquette.
Stilly river sage maintains that she and others suffered greater stalking problems. than myself,volume perhaps, 3 years ago I suffered a TIA I can do without Jack Campin attacks
it is not the fault of the victim if they are stalked, People who stalk have behaviour problems.
Likewise, Bullies have behaviour problems
People that bring up occurrences from another forum from 15 years ago,yes .15 years ago, have an agenda, that agenda is to cause trouble to flame and troll to bully and to intimidate another member.
This has been a classic example of an attempt by Jack Campin to flame a discussion. the original post and subject was relatively harmless
QUOTE


We do not all use our actual names as our mudcat handles but we may know other people's real names.


When we respond to someone on a thread, should we always reply to them by their handle and respect that they may have a reason for their anonymity? Personally I do not mind if people refer to me as Steve or SPB (my initials) or even Co-operator (my profession/ideology), but it could lead to some confusion when other Steves who hold similar views to me are posting in the same thread.

SO THE SUBJECT WAS MUDCAT HANDLES OR REAL NAMES, it was not about anything else.

So spiteful attacks occurred ten years ago, that is not the fault of the person being attacked., clearly there was no protection ten years ago and according to mudcat rules from today still no protection.
All the more reason for people to be adressed by their moniker