Believe it or not, Don, that is a bit better. It shows us a little of how you think. We may disagree but at least you have tried to to explain that your theories started in amateur science and have gone on to pan-psychic theories, which are not science at all. What you still fail to do is acknowledge that many of your past proclamations are not science either but more related to the philosophy of conciousness. And, again, at least you say that something MAY be on the horizon. Theories are fine but not facts. The last personal attack does let you down somewhat though.