Now ..I realise I must be very careful in what I say. Some people don't like certain words. Some say we must allow every possible freedom to all persons and all opinions.

I think (and I offer this as my opinion and not as a definitive statement) that the concept of total freedom is being prejudiced by some contributors who (for their own reasons and possibly good ones) don't want true freedom. The Pol Pot thread is a victim of this total freedom philosophy.

When I posted as a pillock (Iarf) many months ago I recieved a PM that warned me that I was acting like a known trouble maker and told to be careful what I said. I made my reply to the person and let the incident die a natural death. I am now lead to believe from recent threads that whilst the owner of the Cafe wants total freedom maybe the residents don't.

Please note that I am Spot the Dog (ex Iarf) and I am not trolling for flames or have a second agenda. I would like real opinions and would prefer logic rather than vitriol.

I would also like to say that Mudcat (Max?) has created the only entity that has ever changed my political and philosophical mind. This is the reason for my question.

Spot