it is up to you and Robert[mho suggested his articles were lies] to correct his so called "creativity", you are the "scholars" that have criticised Lloyds works.
MacColl has not been mentioned, until you mentioned him in your last post.
Until you or Nick Dow or Robert produce examples of Lloyds fake scholarship, your allegations are unproven.
It is only fair to everyone that one of the three of you do this, since it was you three that made UNQUALIFIED CRITICISM then people will not be misled when reading his work
Good scholarship involves the person making the criticisms to qualify them.
It is your duty as a responsible scholar to give examples from your own experience.