The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #174179 Message #4234225
Posted By: Backwoodsman
13-Jan-26 - 06:55 AM
Thread Name: BS: Brexit and other UK politics thread 4
Subject: RE: BS: Brexit and other UK politics thread 4
I agree with you about Farage’s lack of policies.
For clarity’s sake, in future would you indicate in your posts which parts are your words and where you are quoting from another source please?
Here’s what my search-engine came up with (Duck Duck Go) - fairly similar to yours, but not identical…
“Overview of Reform UK's Economic Policies Reform UK, a right-wing political party in the UK, has proposed various economic policies aimed at reducing taxes and increasing public spending. Their approach has evolved, especially in light of recent economic challenges.
Taxation Policies Proposed Tax Cuts
Total Estimated Cost: Initially proposed tax cuts were estimated at £90 billion per year. Key Proposals: Reduce corporation tax from 25% to 15%. Raise the personal tax allowance to £20,000. Abolish inheritance tax on family farms and businesses. Cut fuel duty by 20p per litre.
Recent Changes The party has recently acknowledged that substantial tax cuts are not realistic due to the current state of public finances. They are now focusing on more modest tax reductions. Spending Policies Increased Public Spending
Total Estimated Cost: Proposed spending increases amount to £53 billion per year. Key Areas of Spending: NHS: £17 billion per year. Defence: £14 billion per year. Policing and prisons: Additional funding included.
Cost-Saving Measures Reform UK aims to reduce government spending by £150 billion per year through cuts in public services, debt interest, and working-age benefits.
Immigration and Welfare The party plans to deport 600,000 unauthorized migrants, claiming this would save £7 billion over the Parliament. Significant welfare cuts are proposed, including reassessing disability claims to reduce costs. Reform UK's economic policies reflect a commitment to tax reduction and increased spending, although recent statements indicate a shift towards more cautious fiscal management.”