> imo The whole Greenland thing is just a diversion
> to distract from the new Government break in of private
> US homes.

Not just that. In Comments on Diddums's Dav(r)os Coredump, I found the following:

"It took the focus away from cost of living and abused young girls"

More importantly, it's distracting from Jack Smith's testifying - today IIRC - that he has a case solid enough to convict Trump for inciting the J6 insurrection.

It's an interesting and unique legal case; because as per the 14th Amendment an insurrectionist cannot stand for president, Trump is not the president now. This raises the argument that the Republicans didn't stand a candidate in 2024, which would mean Kamala Harris is President. This doesn't just eject Trump, it takes his entire administration with him as they would all be serving under false pretences.

This is the first I've seen this.* Can anybody shed light on it? Not that anything is likely to come of it: as another Commentard remarked, Diddums has the USSA by the SCOTUS.

Once I've calmed down a bit, I'll contribute extracts from an article in the New European World before last. Look out for "the chaos is the whole point"; stand by your browsers.

* Mission accomplished.