More snippets from Comments on an ElReg article about the Chicken-in-Chief vs Greenland:

Re: TACO time

It took the focus away from cost of living and abused young girls for a couple of weeks.

.... which brought the response:

More importantly, it's distracting from Jack Smith's testifying - today IIRC - that he has a case solid enough to convict Trump for inciting the J6 insurrection.

It's an interesting and unique legal case; because as per the 14th Amendment an insurrectionist cannot stand for president, Trump is not the president now. This raises the argument that the Republicans didn't stand a candidate in 2024, which would mean Kamala Harris is President. This doesn't just eject Trump, it takes his entire administration with him as they would all be serving under false pretences.

.... which in turn yielded:

Ah, but Trump owns the SCOTUS.

I've not seen any of this other than the above, which causes me to wonder if someone also knows where Smith's grandchildren are. It worked for Vlad ....