Dear Ratnapper,

Clinton (it's still capitalized, whether you like the man or not)

cLINTON's lying can be detected (When his lips are moving)

Well, what's important is that YOU like him! Remember..
BIRDS OF A FEATHER, FLOCK TOGETHER!!!

starting sentences with "did it ever occur to you" is extremely rude. If you want your self-righteous high moral ground to really be unassailable, you would be better served not to use such rude and offensive mannerisms in your posts

Did it ever occur to you that you are perhaps the last person on the planet to be lecturing others on being rude and offensive?

Are you saying that electing one person over another is evidence that you don't think the person not elected is in the same party?

No.

Just because the Republicans elected Bush rather than McCain as their party's candidate in the 2000 election doesn't mean they don't think McCain is a Republican

Most of the votes McCain got were in those states which had "open primaries" which allowed voters outside the party registration to vote in the GOP primaries (a stupid idea). Republicans by and large voted for Bush not McKeating.

That's silly

No, I told you, it's a stupid idea.

I don't write meaningless posts. Nor do I call yours meaningless

Ok, I'll capitulate, you're getting more argumentative and less combative. In fact, I believe I once told you that you were a master debater.

Screwing up HTML sometimes happens. I admitted it and went on. Wish you could

I've apologized to Skeptic in the past and I'll gladly treat you fairly as well. I expect no less.

I said: "I don't capitalize democRAT because there is no democracy in the democRAT party, just marching orders"

Can we have proof of this? Or is this just more of your mudslinging?

Sure, first example off the top of my head. Does the uniform use of the term "gravitas" (to describe the quality lent by Cheney to the Bush campaign) by the news media and democrat operatives overnight not smack of marching orders?

How about the famous "mea culpa" used to refer to Clintons contrition?

If you look at the way the democrats vote in any legislative body (including both houses of the Congress) as a block with very few strays and understand that various members are told by leadership that they will tow the party line or they will get no committee appointments and be opposed in a primary at the next election. The GOP does not operate that way and their voting and "infighting" shows that to be the case. We like to argue (even among ourselves) in case you hadn't noticed.

No matter how much you dislike Clinton, and it is apparent that your dislike for him knows no bounds (and no rationality)

Considering the damage he did to this country (including the current China problem) may not be fully known for decades, should I be happy about that?

not everything he said and did is 100% deplorable

No, he did a good job at Oklahoma City, he did a good job of signing the "Contract with America".

I can't think of what he did that meant much of anything. You?

Your inability to see or admit this is simply childish

Another ad hominem?

I remember Newt Gingrich shutting down the government (not allowing the budget to be voted upon, if I recall)

You said you didn't hear it from Rather or TV news. It matters not, the real source of media talking points is the NY times making sure all liberal press and broadcast media is singing off the same page.

You couldn't remember it correctly if you never heard the truth could you? Tom Delay, Gingrich and other GOP leadership had just met with cLINTON 15 minutes before thought they had a budget deal. cLINTON then went before the press and betrayed them and had previously cleared it with the federal employees unions to have a shutdown. This can be confirmed by asking the above sources. cLINTON had lied again.

Shrimp, fettucine and wine awaits.

later,

mav out