Maybe I should have started a separate thread to post this - as I didn't want to spark off more arguing about the original post. I just thought it was a good idea to use a thread already on the topic to give people interested a chance to read this document and air any views about it. I think a peace proposal which comes from a group of people from both sides who have an understanding of why negotiations are always so difficult and have learned to listen to eachother, is always going to be a better proposal than one from either side, or from countries seen to be allied to one or other side.

Anyone agree?

Bagpuss