I'll concur with Harvey,

He simply points out that words are changed which can alter the songs meaning. He didn't tell the poster off (her even mention her name) and then simply gave his words, followed by a (red-faced?) resubmission to correct spelling mistakes (a personal connection "can certainly be implied").

His second posting further clarifies what he stated.

So, what is the problem?

I trust he will still participate in relevant threads, but with reactions like some of these above, I can't blame him if he doesn't.

Cheers Rana