Clinton:

With that attiude you can almost guarantee showing up again on the human side of the ledger, unless you get so spun up about the whole thing you throw yourself into some alley-cat uterus by accident!!! :>)

The karmic mechanism has this little trick in it -- the hearder you resist some part of reality, the more you have to put it there in order to identify it as the target of all your resistance; and by consequence the more likely you are to "pull it in" to your life. So if you really prefer to migrate off-planet and out-of-species next life, I recommend you start pursuing a level of deep compassion and insite. When all your resistance becomes transformed into understanding,t hen the thing becomes optional instead of just a torrent of reactionary mechanisms, if you see what I mean.

As for whether Men are the New Women, as far as I know there are certain fundamentals that aren't going to change, based on biochemical archetypes.

I am inclined to believe that growing up with breasts, a vagina, a uterus, a monthly cycle and the functional implications of all that equipment actually predisposes a person to emphasize what we think of as feminine principles -- generally seeking nest- and group-based priorities as distinguished from mechanical and conquest oriented priorities.

But the fact that this may be generally true is absolutely no reason to ignore the individual power of decision, which clearly shows that SOME men can end up being more "feminine" than SOME women, and vice-versa. (I'm talking about those who stick with their original physical equiopment here). In other words the predisposition is not a hard and fast categorization and it gets modified by cultural biases, by emotional and physical traumas, and by good or bad education including the presentation of true or false data.

So the question is meaningless, and obviously just meant to sell someone's schlock copy. 'Nuff said.

A