I've checked the folking.com site, it looks good. At a guess I would say it was put together on a rather limited budget. That is no adverse criticism of the site, as I said it looks good and offers some good stuff. I'll go and have a play on it later. The BBC website on the other hand has behind it the huge BBC corporation. It should be good, it should be brilliant. Are the beeb giving us the site the think we need to have, while folking.com and the mudcat ARE what we want?

Mind you the beeb probably think they're giving us a folk programme.

John