Guest said:

Never underestimate the seductiveness of vindictiveness.

Which exactly summarises her contributions here.

Listen, madam, there are people who are not aware of the Bulmer/CM saga. That's why I printed the summary. Tell me, where in that summary do you think I am less than fair? Or is it too much to ask you to justify your hysterical "contributions" here.

And, in case you haven't noticed, it's an ongoing saga.

Despite your claims, no-one is "ripping open Nic's wounds" (we're the ones who have contact with him, directly or indirectly, remember!) So what possible objection is there to my reminding people of this situation?

G.