Art, the technology for killing immense numbers of people, via chemical and biological weapons, is being "improved" in laboratories around the world, but there are presently "moral objections" to genocide and mass murder in most cultures. Would you be opposed to laws and other social efforts to prevent the development and use of that technology? Or should we all just resolve to die peacefully when somebody attacks our city with anthrax or nerve gas, because it's "nature's will" and "if it can happen it will happen"? Sorry, I understand your argument, but I just don't buy it.

Aloha,
Mark