The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #38896   Message #550248
Posted By: LoopySanchez
14-Sep-01 - 04:41 PM
Thread Name: Will Bush Be Blamed?
Subject: RE: Will Bush Be Blamed?
Ah, M.Ted, you certainly pointed out all the errors in my post with that one-line zinger, didn't you? Do you use that one on other occasions when you've been left with no verbal ammo to use upon being presented with fact? I guess it's much easier to say that my words should be banned than to actually point out where they're wrong...I'd guess that you can't, because you know I speak the truth about several on this message board who will attack anything and everything that isn't in line with a 100% leftist (or "centrist" as it is known to leftists) way of thinking, regardless of whether thousands of Americans lay missing in the rubble after multiple terrorist attacks as they're typing their smug little opinions and observations about our leader.

If you'll keep in mind that I'm not entirely right wing, M.Ted, you'll understand me and my words better. If I were a true right winger, I'd be all for shoving religion, Christianity in particular, down everyone's throats, which I'm not. I'd be all for quarrantining AIDS patients on one end of an island somewhere, but I'm not (interestingly, that's exactly what Cuba does, but I digress). I'd be for allowing capitalism to pave the way for penalty-free pollution, clear-cutting, and other environmental abuses, but I'm not. I'd be for locking up non-violent drug offenders, but I'm not...If my assigning political labels to their cheap shots caused them to be offended, then let us consider this debate a draw, and return to the real issues at hand. If Bush comes up soft on the terrorists or shows the first real signs of cowardice, I will be the first person to take issue with him. If someone will remind me later, I have actually composed a rather interesting pair of lists I came up with that point out the major flaws in both major parties' ways of thinking, but I'll save that for another time in which politics is worth discussing. In the meantime, please understand that my earlier post is in response only to those who have yet to understand the necesssity in everyone putting aside the petty differences to unite in the common goal of winning the first war of this milennieum in quick fashion, with as few non-terrorist casualties as we can manage.