The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #39753   Message #564984
Posted By: Jon Freeman
04-Oct-01 - 01:04 PM
Thread Name: BS: Who does it better than Mudcat?
Subject: RE: BS: Who does it better than Mudcat?
Russ, in terms of answering trying to solve the problem of sticking with this type of viewing list but allowing users to select what they wish to view or ingnore, I would have to say The Annexe caters for that particular element far better than anything I have seen (or it does for members).

I also prefer the more common designs (mine was merely an adaption of one) that at least allow the flexibility to split/lump on a stronger method than filtering. This does not really apply to the other music forums I frequent as they are purely musical and (perhaps conatary to the belief of some) I prefer a the mix that is possible here.

In terms of search capabilities, I can think of none better than Mudcat, the format is exceptionally clear and easy to use, the trace facility is superb, the personal message system works well, etc. Overall, I can't think of a system I prefer.

The one extremely limiting factor (which I believe is at database level) was one of the reasons I didn't try to use that format for the Annexe (it simply could not have been used to meet my aims of separate areas each with a person in charge) and I suspect is probably a big reason why I never see any copy cat designs - most people would look for the flexibility to create extra forums even if they didn't use them.

Shame really. If Max, Jeff and crew included that feature in the design, I rekon Mudcat would then be a world beater.

Jon