"Assuming it's true that the Taliban gather and burn them that is a great argument for continuing this action, in my eyes. "

Wolfgang, This is a very good point. In spite of the huge drawbacks of the airlift, if the Taliban hates it, they must think it will accomplish at least some of its purpose.

As to drawbacks: 1.Airlifts can't provide for food distribution. Leads to fighting, hoarding, charging others for the food.

2. It smacks of propaganda, far more than real, effective aid. Sorry, that's how I see it given the way it's being carried out.

3. What they said above -- more traditional efforts at humanitarian aid may be endangered. But in fact I don't know how likely this is, in this particular situation. Impossible to judge until after the fact, alas.

4. Air drops can't really provide nutritious food. What's needed are basic vegetarian staples, etc, such as lentils, rice, bulghur wheat, fava beans... Stuff that can be made into food by adding water and fire. But they're heavy. Yesterday's Washington Post described the food being dropped. Forgive me, can't remember precisely, but they said, first, it is targeted for people who are suffering from malnutrition, therefore is easily digestible, etc. Second, it contains no meat in deference to various religious requirement. Third, each package provides 2200 calories, "a day's requirements".

Among other things each package has a (I think) green bean and potato mix in vinaigrette sauce, a shortbread cookie, some things I don't remember, and some jelly. I had to wonder about the value of feeding straight sugar to hungry people. Maybe it is the best thing but it goes against everything I know about nutrition.... Anyone got more info?