At least it would provide us with a big hole to bury English Heritage in, in a crouching position.....

This is the same English Heritage who dug up 'Seahenge' from a beach in Norfolk to prevent it being destroyed by the sea, enraging a whole heap of locals and others, then put it into a building to preserve it for all time, and when the building burnt down destroying it, didn't tell anyone......

The same English Heritage who dug up bits of my previous home town, destroyed the rarer mediaeval remains of the market town (and fucked up a perfectly good carpark in the meantime...), to try to get to the alleged Roman remains, failed to find any where they were looking.... so made up some strange excuse for it...

The same English Heritage who insist that a building has to be renovated in exactly the same way as it was built, regardless of age, and then refuses to stump up any funding for it, despite the penury of the owners..... unless that owner is a member of it's board... (and an MP)

Shall I go on??

The Stonehenge Tunnel was declined about 15 years ago as being cost prohibitive, would lose the site revenue (people wouldn't be invited to stop, but to keep on going through at high speed), and cause even greater damage than the present road already does.

LTS