Geeze, garg, and here I thought you had had an epiphany!! You're just all covered with leapord-spots, aincha? You are SUCH a jerk sometimes I jes' laugh!

Let me get this straight: you believe that a law which prescribes stoning a single woman to death because she slept with (and became impregnated by) a married male, while prescribing no responsibility or consequernce for said male, is within the rights of nations to impose on their citizens? So much for any credo involving inalienable rights!!

If they really want a death sentence for adultery, because they really think it is a senior problem, fine; let them be stoned to death together!! That'll handle it. THen HIS kids AND her new baby will go parentless. Good solution, huh? Why nopt bury the judge there, while we're at it. What's one asshole more or less?

In any case let the record show that Gargoyle has voted for the death of this woman by being buried to her chest and stoned. And further that he believes the rights of nations shoud be extended to include allowing the male half of the crime to go unscathed, while carrying out the above sentence on the female half. And that by doing so, he votes for orphaning the newborn in the case, currently nursing at said mother's breast while she awaits the result of an appeal.

Garg, I think you must be in the wrong community here. Try www.KKK.com for crissakes!

A