Susan and Wavestar,I am a Catholic, posting in a thread about Catholicism. I would suggest it is the "non-denomenational" and "commercial" Protestant contributions which are irrelevant to this conversation, not the other way around.
I made three very polite, positive guest contributions to this thread before Susan or Spaw came spewing venom.
Anonymous or named guest manners isn't the issue here either. Some people are just not going to treat even well mannered guests with good intentions reasonably, no matter what.
I was really taken aback by Susan's "it isn't Protestant it's commercial" post. First, it was just plain bizarre from a religious perspective, to deny the denomenational perspective of a website by claiming it is commercial.
Second, it was just plain bizarre from any perspective, to claim that there are no differences between Catholic Christians and Protestant Christians, especially in America, and that the bible is the bible, regardless of your chosen faith. There may be non-denominational Protestants, but there is no such thing as a non-denominational Catholic.
But since the vast majority of the people posting to this thread appear to be largely ignorant of the Catholic religion, and/or hostile to organized religion in general, most of you just don't seem to understand just how offensive Susan's response to my post asking about the bible studies website denomination was to me as a Catholic, and how out of context it seemed to this thread and the previous posts.
For the record, the only relevant answers given to Paul's original query were provided by Mousethief, Liland, toadfrog, and myself.
The rest of you are mere infidels. :)