Speaking as a minority here at the Cat, personally I think Bush is doing a far better job than his predecessor or the flunky could have ever had hoped to have done.
We do have to remember that Bush does not run the country on his own, there is a duly elected Democratic Senate that has choosen not to interfere.

Sharon wont be happy until the Palestinians are history. Hilter was evil for his attempted genocide. What makes Sharon any different?

The situation in the middle east is horrific, but, who is killing more of whom?

Any one of the past American leaders could have put a stop to it simply by demading that Israel pull out of the invaded lands under penalty of having all of their military aid diverted to Arab countries and/or Palestine to level the playing field.

Bush has inheirited a bad situation that keeps getting passed down to the next guy. Clinton didnt stop it, nor did Bush the elder, nor Reagan, or Carter, or Ford or Nixon. How far back do we have to go before we find a President/World Leader who was able to stop it?

Chip2447