Claire Vickers' letter states:

"Public entertainment, which would be covered by the premises licence, is defined as music or dancing, or entertainment of a like kind, which is presented publicly for commercial purposes or gain. Public singing which is not undertaken for profit or gain would not be affected."

Maybe I'm misreading it but does that second sentence imply that sessions which don't generate profit or gain (for whom!) are OK?

*Grin*

Nick