I think Mrzzy and Peter's last posts are very interesting. Goes to show that the "way" a story is presented by the media has a lot to do with the credibility of the story on the part of the reader/viewer.

I won't get into the can of worms that comprises most of this thread, but I would make a brief comment about Mick's response to the guest. Any doubters of the spirit in which he responded to "guest" should be satisfied with his explanation I think. There is no way to know if "guest" was reporting correctly, or merely trying to stir the pot.

DougR