Guest I concur, you are now the victum.

It is desperation when they must dash to the dastardly ploy of attacking the speaker. I believe it is known as:

Fallacies of Presumption

Ignoratio Elenchi (Irrelevant Conclusion)

Argumentum ad Hominem (Attack of the Person)

Seeking soltice they have ignored the facts and returned an emotional rebuttal. This is known as an "If you can't win, insult them directly" argument. The end result is that your attackers are now mad at each other, with the level of emotional diatribe escalating at each of their faltering footfalls.

This has been joyous show!

Thank You,
Gargoyle