There has been a great deal of dissatisfaction expressed by Mudcatters with the way George Bush is running things as president. Multiple threads have been posted, or messages have been posted to other threads, about how he stole the election, etc. The inference being that either Gore or Nader would have done a better job.I'm curious. How do you think Al Gore would have handled things if he was President of the U. S. today? For the benefit of Nader fans, how would he have handled things?
Specifically, how would both gentlemen have handled the threat of terror, and the problems of the economy? What would they have done to make our strategic partners more comfortable with world events than Bush has done?
DougR