At risk of repeating myself: I know there's a feud between those who support the two halves of the single Democrat/Republican party - but wouldn't it be better to do the partisan head-bashing in a separate thread, and concentrate on war and peace issues here.

So far as I can see, there's no particular reason why Bush couldn't be a Democrat sitting in the White House, and no reason to think his competence would be any more or less, or that his foreign policies would be significantly different.

So the question is whether they make sense or not, regardlesss of the party label.