The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #51150   Message #779628
Posted By: GUEST,Taliesn
09-Sep-02 - 09:46 AM
Thread Name: BS: Psychics -- What Do They Know? Part 2
Subject: RE: BS: Psychics -- What Do They Know? Part 2
A Case of Cayce (quote) "downloading from Whom?"......

Always a good question, more later.... (quote) "How much of your worldview would you want dictated by a being who couldn't muster the strength to operate a body? "

Bad question. I know your questioning is sincere ,but ,what's all this ".... your worldview " being " dictated by" and by " how much " Bushwah?. My worldview is harldy *dictated* by anyone beyond the physically *enforcable* rules of whichever prevailing regime system that hold sway over anyone. Being a confimred independent f, as stated in an earlier thread, for the better part of 20 years I investigate and compare and then make up my up own mind guided ultimately by a very natural *intuition* as my navigation technique of choice.

Considering the vast info-oceans of gathered intelligence sources one can not hope to begin to know where to look , forget ever knowing where all of the useful nuggets reside , without one's own inner guide.

That said , it also means I do not *limit* myself to the conventional wisdoms and orthodoxies because they ain't the "be all and end all" of what's going on either. They can't be because they are *designed* , from the get-go , to be a functional & manageable *box* of knowledge. I'm sure you're familiar with the now common catchphrase of "thinking outside the box" because of the syndrome of "the world looks like it's all nails if you're a hammer".

(quote) "I mean, just because he (Cayce) taps into an external entity is no guarantee he's tapped in to a higher one. I would hazard that there are just as many loopy cases outside bodies as in 'em. "

Oh absolutely and without a moment's doubt. That is why I stressed that those with professed *psychic* abilities are not to be confused as a *defcto* source of wisdom. However there are precdents on the contributions of those with *vision* that go beyond the private , even *elite* , cirlces ,cliques, and sometimes "cults" of personalities with gifts of varying quality and motives.

In my judgement I thought entering the "Cayce Files", if you will , into the thread would withstand the garden variety knee-jerk dismissals and spark some more useful debate. His *contribution* to what has now become the common currency of preventative medicine culture , no matter the source , would give pause.

Further I believed that his predicitons of substantial Earth changes are at the very least worth watching. No less a source of *conventional wisdom* as National Geographic has published authoritative articles on how scientists have found geological record of the *wanderings* of the Earth's magnetic Poles and are continuing to monitor this as well as the increase in other *Earth changes* that are barely able to kept out of the news.

The tectonic plates and their webwork of intercoherent faultlines rining the Pacific is well-established and *mapped* now. ..... some several generations after the recording of what's become Cacye's codex.

Your call. ;-)