It seems to me,Taliessn, that you have read implications into what Fionn said there which weren't actually there. As take it the point being made wasn't to equate the various cases mentined, it was to say that in calling September 11 and an act of war, you have ruled out calling it an act of murder, and that September 11 was an act of murder rather than an act of war. (And incidentally, it's a point I disagree with, since in my views acts of war are often acts of murder, in the full criminal sense.)

A lot of people do that kind of thing, tearing into people for things they have not actually said or even implied. If I've ever done it, I apologise.