Amos, Bobert,   There is not one FACT in either of your entire representations.

For example: Voters were removed from rosters by local electoral officials, most of whom were Democrats. (That is because even though there were more counties with Republican electoral officials, the bigger counties were Democrat, had more workers, and removed the largest percentage of the black voters, which of course inhabited their counties.) Neither the Governor nor the Secretary of State have anything to do with registering, removing or certifying voters in any way. That FACT alone really shoots your wackoid consipracy theory in the ass.

I have not seen any thing to indicate what the final number nor the percentage of Blacks that were removed. Remember that the Civil Rights Divison of DOJ found no truth at any point to the accusations of the alleged black voters, and took great pains to point out the lies, such as the alleged police harrassment, and the alleged removal of voters who showed no record of EVER having registered, including the black voter who tried to claim he had been prevented from voting when a traffic ticket pointed to the fact he was two STATES over on Election Day. (He later claimed that he was "carried away by the moment"). Twits should understand that to be REMOVED, you first have to have been REGISTERED...

An add this to your convienently forgetful minds; both the two largest counties in which Gore had requested counting were shut down two days before the Supreme Court ruled, by those very Democrat electoral officials.

And the venal stupidity of your statements is only further increased when you realize that dispite all the previous comments about showing the potential of the disenfranchised vote, Brother Bush and Kathleen Harris CRUSHED their Democrat doormats in last months election (a fact not lost on Mr. Gore before his recent departure...).

Do either of you folks have any standing to know what exactly what the word "Conspiracy" means. "Paid goon squads"? "Paid-off Supreme Court Justices"?

The one term I will agree with Amos on is the one about "corruption at the Federal level", since the Federal government was, at that moment, in the hands of the biggest bag of puss to ever hold the Presidency (and thankfully Bush changed all that... ).

But isn't it uncomfortable when all your so-called facts get so easily demolished with relative ease, by a few details...