The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #55341 Message #860446
Posted By: GUEST,Raedwulf
07-Jan-03 - 03:09 AM
Thread Name: BS: Cutting off our own nose
Subject: RE: BS: Cutting off our own nose
I am open to correction, *but* as far as I know, the radiation output of depleted uranium is quite low. Like plutonium exposure, the issue is mostly chemical, not radiation, poisoning (plutonium is one of the most chemically poisonous substances known to man, again, AFAIK).
Depleted uranium was used extensively in the Balkans conflict. Yet again, AFAIK (*sigh*), the number of cases of GWS is not as propotionately high as in the Gulf, which it ought to be if radiation is the cause. If it is chemical effects instead, then I would expect the dry & dusty desert to throw up a greater proportion of cases as there is more likely be disturbance of particles, more airborne dust, etc.
I think the docs probably ought to be able to tell the difference 'twixt radiation sickness & CFIDS by now, so I'll once again disagree with michaelr. I doubt it is 'pure & simple' radiation sickness, though radiation may be one causative factor amongst others.
Last AFAIK... AFAIK, the inclusion of depleted uranium in AP shells is for its properties in terms of mass & penetration, not for any radiological or chemical effects (although if there are any in addition, I daresay the High Command regard that as a useful side-effect {rollseyes}). Depleted uranium is an armour penetration weapon & not used elsewhere (AFAIK) - don't chase red herrings just cos the word 'uranium' pops up.
As I say, I'm open to correction. I don't have hard facts & figures & haven't taken too much interest in the various conspiracy theories over whether GWS exists (yes I do think it's real, FWIW) &, if so, what causes it; but I used to know stuff about heavy elements & I tend to soak up odd fragments of data... *g*