As one who works (a euphemism) peripherally in the computer book publiishing industry, I must take mild exception to Kim C's "people who really know about these subjects, speak in $20 words."

The use of jargon, when not specifically warrented, is the first evidence of one who does NOT understand his subject or his audience. And there are no $20 words. With a proper definition, which is too frequently omitted, anything that initially looks like a $20 word is at best a $2 word perfectly useful in the commerce of information exchange.

An EDUCATOR (that should be printed about 9 feet tall), whom I greatly respected, once said "If you can't explain it to a 12-year old, YOU don't understand it." I firmly believe in that principle, although it sets a high standard - particularly for an old fart like me who avoids, on principle, associating with juveniles.

Not every book should be written in the language of the uninformed - but if you can't put it in that language, you're not ready to write with authority for those who already know the "buzzwords."

Unfortunately, when someone produces something useful, the people who understand it are usually busy using - or improving - it. The ones left over to be "authors" are too frequently those who have only superficial understanding, but will do anything to make a $buck$ until they can find a real job. (cynical observation - don't take me too seriously)

The question of why so many people put themselves in the "Dummy/Idiot" class deserves real examination, but my opinions there probably need a book - not a post.

John