Reuter's is also carrying the story today, and the allegations of plaguerism are solid and verifiable.

The issue here is not whether the informaiton is true, but rather that the so-called "intelligence"sources of the UK in this matter is really someone surfing the web and copying and pasting articles, typos and all.

Yet, we are supposed to take all this "secret intelligence" the US and UK governments are bandying about as truth?

There's a disconnect when our conspiracy-theory GUEST swears eerything he reads on a web page is true, and he is rightfully criticized for that assumption, while governments who are spending billions in tax dollars to find intelligence do the same thing... and we're supposed to believe THEM?